Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Raul Brancaccio Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Brancaccio analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Raul Brancaccio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Brancaccio
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 50.72% of points on their second serve, while Brancaccio has won 44.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 54.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brancaccio has won 51.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.63% and 34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 64.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brancaccio has saved 60.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 60.92% of matches played (W/L 53/ 34), with Brancaccio winning 44.23% (W/L 23/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Brancaccio has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 57/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Brancaccio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 20/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broom winning 1 times and Brancaccio being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Broom winning 2 and Brancaccio winning 0. The last match between Broom and Brancaccio was at the Ilkley Challenger, 21-06-2023, Second, Grass with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Brancaccio have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Brancaccio 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 0, and Brancaccio 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.34 while Brancaccio has played against players with an average rank of 335.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brancaccio has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 37.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brancaccio has converted 45.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
245
Rank
235
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
377
Rank
121
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
63% (214-124)
Career Total W/L
58% (329-239)
62% (29-18)
YTD W/L
44% (12-15)
$39,970
Career Prize Money
$119,520
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Charles Broom vs Raul Brancaccio For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Broom VS Brancaccio
Sportsbook
Offer
Broom VS Brancaccio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Charles Broom | Raul Brancaccio |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:4 | 1:6:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (40/65) | 60% (29/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (32/40) | 55% (16/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (23/48) | 35% (23/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Broom VS Brancaccio H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Raul Brancaccio
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Raul Brancaccio |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (29/18) | 44% (12/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (68/48) | 45% (29/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (580/535) | 49% (296/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 55% (6/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 301 | 69 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 116 | 140 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:45 | 1:42:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.4 | 363.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (2242/3496) | 61% (1176/1936) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1589/2242) | 68% (805/1176) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (636/1254) | 44% (335/760) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (144/389) | 45% (86/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1528/3783) | 41% (806/1971) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (13/10) | 43% (10/13) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (15/6) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (29/47) | 44% (12/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (10/16) | 40% (4/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (12/22) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (29/22) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (29/7) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 39% (18/7) | 21% (14/3) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
87 of
133)
1st Serve %
64%
(
84 of
131)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
58 of
84)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
49 of
131)
134
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(1) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Francisco Comesana
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
1
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
10
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Billy Harris
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lloyd Harris
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Raul Brancaccio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Raul Brancaccio
45%
(
37 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
9
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
58%
(
61 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
7
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
5
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Raul Brancaccio
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Raul Brancaccio
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
7
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Raul Brancaccio
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Raul Brancaccio
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
1
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Raul Brancaccio
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Brancaccio Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Broom are available here and Brancaccio photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
